The One More Paradox: How Many Bank Heists Should You Do?

When planning a life of crime (hypothetically, of course), a critical question arises: how many bank heists should you commit before calling it quits? One heist might leave you short of a comfortable retirement, while pushing your luck with 50 might land you in jail faster than you can say "stick 'em up."

This question of optimizing your crime spree involves weighing risk against reward—a classic problem of expected utility. Let’s dive into the math of heist planning to uncover how many bank jobs make sense, purely as a thought experiment.

Modeling the Decision

To keep things simple, here are the ground rules of our hypothetical scenario:

Your goal? Maximize your expected utility, a measure of the risk-weighted payoff.

The Math Behind the Paradox

The table below breaks down the math. For each number of heists, we calculate:

  1. Probability of freedom: The chance of getting away with all heists.
  2. Utility in freedom: Total earnings from successful heists.
  3. Expected utility: The product of the probability of freedom and utility in freedom.
Amount Bank Heists Probability of Freedom Utility in Freedom Expected Utility (Probability in Freedom * Utility in Freedom)
0 1.0000 1,000,000 1,000,000.0
1 0.8000 2,000,000 1,600,000.0
2 0.6400 3,000,000 1,920,000.0
3 0.5120 4,000,000 2,048,000.0
4 0.4096 5,000,000 2,048,000.0
5 0.3277 6,000,000 1,966,200.0
6 0.2621 7,000,000 1,834,700.0
7 0.2097 8,000,000 1,677,600.0
8 0.1678 9,000,000 1,510,200.0
9 0.1342 10,000,000 1,342,000.0
10 0.1074 11,000,000 1,181,400.0
11 0.0859 12,000,000 1,030,800.0
12 0.0687 13,000,000 893,100.0
13 0.0550 14,000,000 770,000.0
14 0.0440 15,000,000 660,000.0
15 0.0352 16,000,000 563,200.0
16 0.0281 17,000,000 477,700.0
17 0.0225 18,000,000 405,000.0
18 0.0180 19,000,000 342,000.0
19 0.0144 20,000,000 288,000.0
20 0.0115 21,000,000 241,500.0

Finding the Sweet Spot

From the table, we can see a clear trend:

So, the optimal number of bank heists to maximize your expected utility is between three and four.

The “One More Paradox”

Why does this happen?

At the start of your career, the odds are in your favor. A single heist is worth the risk because you have a high chance of gaining one more million. However, as you accumulate more loot, the value of adding another million diminishes compared to the growing probability of losing everything.

This creates the "one more paradox": the temptation to attempt just one more heist often leads to disaster. Rationally, you should stop after your fourth heist. Emotionally, many would push their luck—and pay the price.

Disclaimer

While this analysis is fun and illuminating, it comes with a crucial caveat: don’t rob banks. From a purely mathematical perspective, even a single bank heist is suboptimal. In modern times, the success rate for high-stakes crime has plummeted thanks to surveillance, advanced forensics, and strict security measures.

In short, the truly optimal number of bank heists is zero.

Final Thoughts

The "one more paradox" is not just limited to hypothetical bank robberies. It applies to many real-life scenarios, from gambling to investment strategies. Knowing when to stop—when the risks outweigh the rewards—is a critical skill in game theory and life.

So, next time you’re tempted to push your luck, ask yourself: is “one more” really worth it? Chances are, the answer is no.

Disclaimer: This article is purely for entertainment and educational purposes. Always follow the law.